From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Contrearus v. Hooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 21, 2016
CASE NO.: 3:15 CV 783 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 21, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:15 CV 783

07-21-2016

HUGH CONTREARUS, Petitioner, v. MARK HOOKS, Warden, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli, submitted in this matter on July 1, 2016. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as reflected in the Report and Recommendation and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that petition is hereby DISMISSED.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court's decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ John R . Adams

JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Dated: July 21, 2016


Summaries of

Contrearus v. Hooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 21, 2016
CASE NO.: 3:15 CV 783 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Contrearus v. Hooks

Case Details

Full title:HUGH CONTREARUS, Petitioner, v. MARK HOOKS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 21, 2016

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:15 CV 783 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 21, 2016)