From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Contra Costa Cnty. Redevelopment Agency v. Hous. Auth. of Contra Costa Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
Case No. 11-3605 TEH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-3605 TEH

10-26-2011

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic, Plaintiff, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of California; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; and DOES ONE THROUGH TWENTY, and all other persons unknown claiming an interest in the property, Defendants.

SHARON L. ANDERSON County Counsel STEPHEN M. SIPTROTH Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Plaintiffs SHARON L. ANDERSON County Counsel KEIKO KOBAYASHI Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendant Housing Authority of Contra Costa County MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney CHARLES M. O'CONNOR Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the Federal Defendant


MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

CHARLES M. O'CONNOR (CSBN 56320)

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Federal Defendant

STIPULATION EXTENDING

DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND

TO COMPLAINT IN CONDEMNATION

Plaintiff filed its Complaint in Condemnation ("Complaint") in the Superior Court of California, Contra Costa County on or about June 7, 2011, and caused a Summons and the Complaint to be served on the Office of the U.S. Attorney, Northern District of California, on or about June 24, 2011.

On July 22, 2011, the Defendant United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") caused a Notice of Removal of this civil action to be filed in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. Pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c)(2)(C), and a previous stipulated extension of the time for HUD to file its answer to the Complaint, the answer is now due by October 27, 2011. Because HUD's on-going review of the status of the subject property must precede and be concluded before it can make any decision as to the dispostion of that property, HUD has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to stipulate to an extension of time to answer the Complaint. HUD anticipates that the aforementioned review of the status of the property can be completed before the expiration of this extension, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the Defendants may have an additional 90 days, until January 20, 2012, to answer or otherwise plead to the Complaint.

Respectfully submitted,

SHARON L. ANDERSON

County Counsel

STEPHEN M. SIPTROTH

Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SHARON L. ANDERSON

County Counsel

KEIKO KOBAYASHI

Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys for Defendant Housing Authority of

Contra Costa County

MELINDA L. HAAG

United States Attorney

CHARLES M. O'CONNOR

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for the Federal Defendant

Thelton E. Henderson


Summaries of

Contra Costa Cnty. Redevelopment Agency v. Hous. Auth. of Contra Costa Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
Case No. 11-3605 TEH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Contra Costa Cnty. Redevelopment Agency v. Hous. Auth. of Contra Costa Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

Case No. 11-3605 TEH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)