From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cont'l Motors, Inc. v. Johnson

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 21, 2021
317 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D19-1232

04-21-2021

CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Appellant, v. Carly JOHNSON, etc., Appellee.

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner and Douglas E. Winter (Washington, DC); Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., and Alyssa M. Reiter (Fort Lauderdale); Skinner Law Group and Laurie A. Salita (Malvern, PA); Bowman and Brooke LLP and Wendy F. Lumish, for appellant. Podhurst Orseck, P.A., and Joel D. Eaton, Ricardo M. Martinez-Cid and Lea P. Bucciero, for appellee.


Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner and Douglas E. Winter (Washington, DC); Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., and Alyssa M. Reiter (Fort Lauderdale); Skinner Law Group and Laurie A. Salita (Malvern, PA); Bowman and Brooke LLP and Wendy F. Lumish, for appellant.

Podhurst Orseck, P.A., and Joel D. Eaton, Ricardo M. Martinez-Cid and Lea P. Bucciero, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The assessment of a fine for failure to comply with an order compelling discovery "must be predicated upon a finding of contempt." Channel Components, Inc. v. Am. II Elecs., Inc., 915 So. 2d 1278, 1283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Because the sanctions order in this case explicitly finds that the attorneys’ failure to comply "was not willful, deliberate and contumacious," we reverse the portion of the order imposing the fine. As to all other issues on appeal, we affirm without further discussion.

Affirmed, in part, and reversed, in part.


Summaries of

Cont'l Motors, Inc. v. Johnson

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 21, 2021
317 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Cont'l Motors, Inc. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:Continental Motors, Inc., Appellant, v. Carly Johnson, etc., Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Apr 21, 2021

Citations

317 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)