From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Contino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 20, 2022
No. 28030-21 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

28030-21

01-20-2022

Louis Contino & Ellen Contino Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge.

The petition filed to commence this case served on October 27, 2021, did not bear original signatures on the petition of petitioners or of a representative with proper authorization and capacity pursuant to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Rather, it appears that petitioners' non-attorney representative who is not admitted to practice before this Court signed the petition on their behalf. The United States Tax Court, which is separate and independent from the IRS, has certain requirements that must be met before an individual can be recognized as representing petitioners before the Court. Unlike the IRS, the Court does not recognize powers of attorneys and, thus, petitioners' non-attorney representative may not represent them in this case. The Court has prepared Q&A's on the subject "Representing a Taxpayer Before the U.S. Tax Court. A copy of these Q&A's are attached to this order. The Court also encourages practitioners and non-attorneys seeking admission to practice before the Court to consult "Guidance for Practitioners" on the Court's website at www.ustaxcourt.gov/ practitioners.html. At this juncture, Barry Mirsky will not be associated with this case.

By Order issued October 29, 2021, the Court directed petitioners to file a proper amended petition by December 14, 2021. Petitioners have not complied with that Order. Upon due consideration and for cause, it is

ORDERED that the time within which petitioners shall file an amended petition, is extended to March 3, 2022. The Amended Petition must be filed in PAPER FORM (NOT ELECTRONICALLY), bearing the original signature of petitioners. If the Amended Petition is not received by that date, the Court may dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction.

ORDERED that the time within which petitionerscshall pay the Court's $60.00 filing fee (or submit an Application for Waiver of Filing Fee form, which is available under the "eFiling & Case Maintenance" tab on the Court's website, www.ustaxcourt.gov), is extended to March 3, 2022. If the filing fee (or proper application for waiver) is not received by that date, the Court may dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to the copy of this Order the Court's Q&As on the subject "Representing a Taxpayer Before the U.S. Tax Court". It is further

ORDERED that, in addition to regular service, the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Barry Mirsky at the address listed for him in the petition.


Summaries of

Contino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 20, 2022
No. 28030-21 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Contino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Louis Contino & Ellen Contino Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Citations

No. 28030-21 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 20, 2022)