From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Continental Insurance Company v. Jones

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 9, 1992
592 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 1992)

Opinion

No. 77219.

January 9, 1992.

Appeal from the District Court.

Love Phipps and Scott R. McNary of Corlett, Killian, Ober, Hardeman Levi, P.A., Miami, for defendant-appellant.

Patrice A. Talisman of Daniels Talisman, P.A., Miami, Roland Gomez, Miami Lakes, and Robert J. Dickman, P.A., Coral Gables, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Raymond T. Elligett, Jr. of Schropp, Buell Elligett, P.A., Tampa, amicus curiae for Prudential Property and Cas. Ins. Co.

George A. Vaka of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal Banker, P.A., Tampa, amicus curiae for Florida Ass'n for Ins. Review.

Joel D. Eaton of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin Perwin, P.A.; and Roy D. Wasson, Miami, amicus curiae for Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers.

David B. Shelton of Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell, Cabaniss, Burke Wechsler, Orlando, amicus curiae for Florida Defense Lawyers Ass'n.


We respond to Jones v. Continental Insurance Co., 920 F.2d 847, 851 (11th Cir. 1991), in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida:

What is the appropriate measure of damages in a first-party action for bad faith failure to settle an uninsured motorist insurance claim (under Fla. Stat. § 624.155(1)(b)(1.)[)]?

We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(6), Florida Constitution.

We recently addressed this issue in McLeod v. Continental Insurance Co., 591 So.2d 621 (Fla. 1992), and held that the damages recoverable in a first-party bad faith suit under section 624.155, Florida Statutes (1989), are those damages which are the natural, proximate, probable, or direct consequence of the insurer's bad faith. We further held that such damages may include, but are not limited to, interest, court costs, and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the plaintiff. Accordingly, the certified question in this case is answered by reference to our decision in McLeod.

We choose not to address the other issues raised by Continental.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur.

BARKETT, J., dissents with an opinion, in which KOGAN, J., concurs.


I dissent for the reasons expressed in my opinion in McLeod v. Continental, 591 So.2d 621 (Fla. 1992) (Barkett, J., dissenting).

KOGAN, J., concurs.


Summaries of

Continental Insurance Company v. Jones

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 9, 1992
592 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 1992)
Case details for

Continental Insurance Company v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, v. THOMAS F. JONES…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 9, 1992

Citations

592 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 1992)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Continental Insurance Company

Id. at 851. The Florida Supreme Court recently responded to this question in Continental Insurance Co. v.…

Heritage Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance

In any event, the district court also correctly concluded that Heritage could not recover because the damages…