From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Continental Cas. Co. v. Rizzio Truck Co.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three
Jun 28, 1963
217 Cal.App.2d 771 (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)

Opinion

Docket No. 26317.

June 28, 1963.

APPEAL from an order of the Superor Court of Los Angeles County sustaining a demurrer to a complaint with leave to amend. Macklin Fleming, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Weingand, Tipton, Kendig Stockwell and Eugene L. Stockwell, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Hecker, Dunford Kenealy and Mark R. McKee for Defendant and Respondent.


Plaintiff's notice of appeal states that plaintiff appeals "from the judgment of the above captioned court sustaining defendants' demurrer to plaintiff's complaint on the 7th day of December, 1961."

The record on appeal contains a minute order dated December 7, 1961, whereby the demurrer of one defendant was sustained with leave to amend within 10 days. There is no judgment. [1] The order sustaining the demurrer is not appealable, and this court has no choice but to dismiss the appeal. ( Curnutt v. Holk, 203 Cal.App.2d 6 [ 21 Cal.Rptr. 224].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Shinn, P.J., and Ford, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Continental Cas. Co. v. Rizzio Truck Co.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three
Jun 28, 1963
217 Cal.App.2d 771 (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)
Case details for

Continental Cas. Co. v. Rizzio Truck Co.

Case Details

Full title:CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RIZZIO TRUCK…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three

Date published: Jun 28, 1963

Citations

217 Cal.App.2d 771 (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)
32 Cal. Rptr. 132

Citing Cases

Pastore v. Cnty. of Santa Cruz

If it allowed leave to amend, it was not a final disposition of the action and thus not an appealable…