From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Mundo Travel Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 13, 2006
No. CV-F-05-1050 REC LJO, (Doc. 22) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV-F-05-1050 REC LJO, (Doc. 22).

February 13, 2006


ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC MODIFYING THE COURT'S ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT.


On January 26, 2006, the Court issued its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and Directing Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint (the "Order") (Doc. 22).

On line 25 of page 19 of the Order, through line 1 of page 20, the Court wrote: "Under a provable set of facts, the Court ultimately could conclude that the ARA does obligate Mundo to follow the Policy."

The Court hereby modifies the Order nunc pro tunc so that sentence reads, "Under a provable set of facts, the Court ultimately could conclude that the ARA does not obligate Mundo to follow the Policy."

In all other respects, the Order remains unchanged.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Mundo Travel Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 13, 2006
No. CV-F-05-1050 REC LJO, (Doc. 22) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Mundo Travel Corporation

Case Details

Full title:CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., Plaintiff, v. MUNDO TRAVEL CORPORATION, a…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 13, 2006

Citations

No. CV-F-05-1050 REC LJO, (Doc. 22) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2006)