From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conterman v. Hannan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

November, 1929.

Present — Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that the appellant has failed to show that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted by changing the place of trial.


Summaries of

Conterman v. Hannan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Conterman v. Hannan

Case Details

Full title:ONEITA CONTERMAN, Respondent, v. LOUIS H. HANNAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1929

Citations

227 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)