From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Contant v. Kelly

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Aug 2, 2017
153 A.D.3d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

08-02-2017

In the Matter of Isan CONTANT, petitioner, v. William A. KELLY, etc., respondent.

Isan Contant, Mt. Lambert, Trinidad and Tobago, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, NY (Alissa S. Wright of counsel), for respondent.


Isan Contant, Mt. Lambert, Trinidad and Tobago, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, NY (Alissa S. Wright of counsel), for respondent.

L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P. SHERI S. ROMAN FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY BETSY BARROS, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, to hold a hearing on the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to vacate a judgment of that court rendered October 3, 2007, in a criminal action entitled People v. Contant, brought under Rockland County Indictment No. 06–00362, and application by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

ORDERED that the application for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16, 439 N.Y.S.2d 882, 422 N.E.2d 542 ). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

HALL, J.P., ROMAN, CONNOLLY and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Contant v. Kelly

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Aug 2, 2017
153 A.D.3d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Contant v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Isan Contant, petitioner, v. William A. Kelly, etc.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Aug 2, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 5951
56 N.Y.S.3d 886