From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Consul v. Choisser

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 7, 2021
314 So. 3d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-1674

04-07-2021

Charbel CONSUL, Appellant, v. William CHOISSER, Appellee.

Isaac R. Ruiz-Carus and Katherine A. Gannon of Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue, McLain & Mangan, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Joseph T. Kissane of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Jacksonville; Jeffrey E. Bigman of Smith, Bigman & Brock, P.A., Daytona Beach; E. Aaron Sprague and Matthew N. Posgay of Coker Law, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.


Isaac R. Ruiz-Carus and Katherine A. Gannon of Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue, McLain & Mangan, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Joseph T. Kissane of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Jacksonville; Jeffrey E. Bigman of Smith, Bigman & Brock, P.A., Daytona Beach; E. Aaron Sprague and Matthew N. Posgay of Coker Law, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis, Roberts, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Consul v. Choisser

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 7, 2021
314 So. 3d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Consul v. Choisser

Case Details

Full title:CHARBEL CONSUL, Appellant, v. WILLIAM CHOISSER, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 7, 2021

Citations

314 So. 3d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)