Summary
holding that absent any indication the jury had actually rendered a verdict based on the excluded conduct, there was no final adjudication of such conduct, even though it worked some unfairness to the insurer who was obviously unable to intervene in the underlying criminal case and pose the necessary, and more specific, question to the jury
Summary of this case from Pendergest-Holt v. Certain UnderwritersOpinion
No. 98-9314.
July 7, 1999.
Appeal from the S.D.N.Y., 980 F.Supp. 124.
Affirmed.