From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Constant v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 18, 2016
SC: 153609 (Mich. Nov. 18, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153609

11-18-2016

JOSEPH CONSTANT, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.


Order

153609 & (14) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices AGC: 1770-15

On order of the Court, the motion to amend is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 18, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Constant v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 18, 2016
SC: 153609 (Mich. Nov. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Constant v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH CONSTANT, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Nov 18, 2016

Citations

SC: 153609 (Mich. Nov. 18, 2016)