From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Constancio v. Superior Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 3, 2022
2:22-CV-1277-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-1277-KJM-DMC-P

10-03-2022

OSCAR M. CONSTANCIO, Petitioner, v. SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 8. Petitioner has submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that Petitioner is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 8, is granted.


Summaries of

Constancio v. Superior Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 3, 2022
2:22-CV-1277-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Constancio v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR M. CONSTANCIO, Petitioner, v. SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 3, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-1277-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)