Opinion
CASE NO. C06-06247 CW.
January 23, 2007
Teresa S. Renaker Lewis, Michelle Lee Roberts, Feinberg, Lee, Renaker Jackson, P.C., Oakland, CA, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Dennis G. Rolstad Sedgwick, Detert, Moran Arnold San Francisco, CA, Attorney for Defendant.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Private Process:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private ADR ( please identify process and provider) _______________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
UKC; other requested deadline April 30, 2007
[ PROPOSED ] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
Non-binding Arbitration
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
UKC; Mediation
Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
90 days from the date of this order.
UKC; other April 30, 2007
IT IS SO ORDERED.