From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Consolo v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 18, 1952
201 F.2d 56 (6th Cir. 1952)

Opinion

No. 11621.

December 18, 1952.

Joel Krupman, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

John J. Kane, Jr., and J.W. Kulka, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.


This appeal, from a judgment of conviction entered upon the verdict of a jury and from a sentence of five years' imprisonment imposed by the United States District Judge, has been heard and considered on the record and on the oral arguments and briefs of opposing attorneys;

And it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the charge that appellant caused to be transported in interstate commerce a stolen motor vehicle, knowing that the same had been stolen, that the case was submitted to the jury on a correct charge and that no error of law was committed in the trial of the case;

The judgment of conviction and sentence is in consequence affirmed.


Summaries of

Consolo v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 18, 1952
201 F.2d 56 (6th Cir. 1952)
Case details for

Consolo v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CONSOLO v. UNITED STATES

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 18, 1952

Citations

201 F.2d 56 (6th Cir. 1952)