Summary
stating that "the need identified by plaintiffs is also not particularly pressing since the weight of the need hinges on plaintiffs' assumption that the fee is unconstitutional, even though the Federal Circuit explicitly found otherwise"
Summary of this case from Eaglehawk Carbon, Inc. v. United StatesOpinion
No. 10–1020.
06-13-2011
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.