From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Consolidated Terminal Corp. v. Henderson

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Jan 6, 1942
8 F.R.D. 494 (D.D.C. 1942)

Opinion

         Action by Consolidated Terminal Corporation, against Jimmie R. Henderson, otherwise known as Mrs. J. R. Henderson, wherein plaintiff filed what was denominated in complaint as a cross-claim against Bertie S. Gillespie. On motion to dismiss purported cross-claim.

         Motion granted.

          Daniel Partridge III and Charles Effinger Smoot, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

          J. Richard Earle, of Washington, D. C., for defendant Jimmie R. Henderson.

          R. Sidney Johnson, of Washington, D. C., for defendant Bertie S. Gillespie.


          BAILEY, Associate Justice.

         The motion to dismiss what is denominated in the complaint as a cross claim should be sustained. The complaint does not seek to enforce any lien upon the property sold to the defendant Henderson but to maintain this ‘ cross claim,’ would be to permit the plaintiff to bring in any party who may be indebted to the defendant Henderson. If the plaintiff should be successful in obtaining a judgment against defendant Henderson, it would not thereby have any priority over other creditors except as to any judgment lien to which it might be entitled.


Summaries of

Consolidated Terminal Corp. v. Henderson

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Jan 6, 1942
8 F.R.D. 494 (D.D.C. 1942)
Case details for

Consolidated Terminal Corp. v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:CONSOLIDATED TERMINAL CORPORATION v. HENDERSON et al.

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Jan 6, 1942

Citations

8 F.R.D. 494 (D.D.C. 1942)