From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Consolidated Edison of N.Y. v. Yeshiva Univ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1979
67 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

February 27, 1979


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 6, 1978, modified, on the law, to strike therefrom the first and second decretal paragraphs thereof, substituting therefor a decretal paragraph granting the motion for summary judgment of plaintiff-appellant-respondent and denying the cross motion of defendant-respondent-appellant and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Suit was for late charges on unpaid gas and electric bills. Special Term granted summary judgment for the second category only. The charge imposed for late payments is neither a penalty nor a service charge, is neither unreasonable nor other than compensatory, nor is it excessive as to the practice of compounding by adding outstanding interest for each period to the prior debt. In any event, its reasonableness is for the Public Service Commission to decide. (Cardone v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 197 Misc. 188, 191, affd 276 App. Div. 1068.) The distinction made by Special Term between late charges imposed on indebtedness for gas and those for electricity, based on subdivision 6 of section 65 Pub. Serv. of the Public Service Law, is without validity, and summary judgment should have been granted for the former as well as the latter.

Concur — Sandler, J.P., Lane, Markewich, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.


Summaries of

Consolidated Edison of N.Y. v. Yeshiva Univ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1979
67 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Consolidated Edison of N.Y. v. Yeshiva Univ

Case Details

Full title:CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Appellant-Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1979

Citations

67 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Suffolk Cty. Water Auth v. Bd. of Fire Commr's

Moreover, the court here further erred in refusing to honor the authority's claim to a 1 1/2% so-called…

Millenium Env. v. City of Long Beach

" In light of the City's unconditional obligation to timely pay the waste disposal fees each month, it is…