standing does not exist if future injury is too speculative — if the record provides little indication that the plaintiffs had firm intentions to "take action that would trigger the challenged governmental action" or that if they did, "they would be subjected to the challenged governmental action"
Summary of this case from Murphy v. KenopsNo. 91-1342.
April 20, 1992.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 949 F. 2d 960.
standing does not exist if future injury is too speculative — if the record provides little indication that the plaintiffs had firm intentions to "take action that would trigger the challenged governmental action" or that if they did, "they would be subjected to the challenged governmental action"
Summary of this case from Murphy v. KenopsFull title:CONSOLIDATED BEEF INDUSTRIES, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A FIDUCIARY UNDER…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 20, 1992
A defendant acts "recklessly" if his or her conduct "`evince[s] disregard of, or indifference to,…
Coalition for Economic Equity v. WilsonSome of these programs have been subjected to judicial challenge and found to be constitutionally…