From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Consiglio v. Hickman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1917 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1917 DFL GGH P.

August 17, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 26, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 26, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant's March 3, 2006, motion to dismiss is granted, and this action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Consiglio v. Hickman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1917 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Consiglio v. Hickman

Case Details

Full title:SAM CONSIGLIO, Plaintiff, v. RODERICK HICKMAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 17, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1917 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)