From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conrad v. United Skates of America, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1998
251 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 1, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that the accident was caused by a sudden collision common to skating, and not by the reckless actions of another skater which the defendant, by adequate supervision, could have prevented ( see, Fritz v. City of Buffalo, 277 N.Y. 710; Nunez v. Recreation Rooms Settlement, 229 A.D.2d 359; Shorten v. City of White Plains, 224 A.D.2d 515). The Supreme Court therefore properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Conrad v. United Skates of America, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1998
251 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Conrad v. United Skates of America, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE CONRAD et al., Respondents, v. UNITED SKATES OF AMERICA, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 806

Citing Cases

Winkler v. County of Nassau

The evidence further indicated that the skater persisted in skating in the opposite direction from the other…