From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conrad v. Batz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Apr 3, 2014
2014 WI App. 63 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2013AP1367.

2014-04-3

Catherine CONRAD, Plaintiff–Appellant, Rigrad Music & Publishing LLC and Rodney Rigsby, Plaintiffs, v. David BATZ, Sharon Batz and Shanauba Productions, Defendants–Respondents.

Allegations that Rigsby was not compensated for his alleged loss of income do not state a claim upon which Conrad could be granted relief. The circuit court properly determined based upon the allegations in the complaint and Conrad's statements at the hearing that Conrad's own breach of contract claim had already been satisfied by the $3,000 Batz paid her.



Summaries of

Conrad v. Batz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Apr 3, 2014
2014 WI App. 63 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Conrad v. Batz

Case Details

Full title:Catherine CONRAD, Plaintiff–Appellant, Rigrad Music & Publishing LLC and…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Apr 3, 2014

Citations

2014 WI App. 63 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
354 Wis. 2d 324
847 N.W.2d 426

Citing Cases

Karl v. United States

The court found only one pertinent decision, an unpublished one from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals…