From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conoscenti v. Holbrook, Cabot Rollins C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1915
169 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

June, 1915.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk's office on the 26th day of January, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered on the 29th day of January, 1915, denying a motion for a new trial. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Ingraham, P.J., and McLaughlin, J., dissented upon the ground that there was no evidence to sustain a finding that the defendant was negligent or that the decedent was free from contributory negligence, but the testimony expressly shows that the accident was caused by a violation of the rules established for the protection of defendant's employees and by an occurrence which the defendant could not have anticipated.


Summaries of

Conoscenti v. Holbrook, Cabot Rollins C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1915
169 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

Conoscenti v. Holbrook, Cabot Rollins C

Case Details

Full title:Euplio Conoscenti, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Holbrook, Cabot…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1915

Citations

169 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)