From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conoscente v. Manfredi

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 14, 1948
191 Misc. 929 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)

Opinion

June 14, 1948.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, WYNNE, J.

Joseph C. Bottitta for appellant.

Abraham L. Siegel for respondent.


The judgment should be affirmed, with $25 costs to respondent.

The appeals from the orders are dismissed. No order denying defendant's motion to set aside the verdict is contained in the record. An order denying a motion to reargue is not appealable. (N.Y. City Mun. Ct. Code [L. 1915, ch. 279], § 154; Lehman v. Brooklyn Queens Transit Corp., 30 N.Y.S.2d 716; Hygrade-Magnet Corp. v. Supino, 23 N.Y.S.2d 55; Millstein v. Schwartz, 23 N.Y.S.2d 357.)

MACCRATE, STEINBRINK and RUBENSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

Conoscente v. Manfredi

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 14, 1948
191 Misc. 929 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
Case details for

Conoscente v. Manfredi

Case Details

Full title:MARIA CONOSCENTE, Respondent, v. THOMAS MANFREDI, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1948

Citations

191 Misc. 929 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
82 N.Y.S.2d 771