From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connor v. Rami I, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 1996
234 A.D.2d 58 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 5, 1996.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered January 23, 1996, which denied third-party defendant's motion for a change of venue to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Appellants concede that New York County is a proper venue. The motion therefore was addressed to the sound discretion of the IAS Court, and there was no improvident exercise of such discretion ( Hartigan v Kurian, 224 AD2d 299). There was an insufficient showing that nonparty material witnesses would be inconvenienced by trial of this action in New York County ( see, Heinemann v Grunfeld, 224 AD2d 204; Klugman v Food Emporium, 226 AD2d 321). We have considered appellants' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

Connor v. Rami I, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 1996
234 A.D.2d 58 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Connor v. Rami I, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES F. CONNOR, JR., et al., Respondents, v. RAMI I, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 5, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 58 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 559