From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connor v. Modica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 2006
33 A.D.3d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2006-07182.

October 31, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Deborah Stevens Modica, a Justice of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County, to vacate an order of that court dated May 15, 2006, in an action entitled People v O'Connor, pending under docket No. 6Q005976, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Before: Crane, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

Connor v. Modica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 2006
33 A.D.3d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Connor v. Modica

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT O'CONNOR, Petitioner, v. DEBORAH STEVENS MODICA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 31, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7887
822 N.Y.S.2d 713

Citing Cases

Benevolent Assoc. v. Haverstraw

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The "extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to…