From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connery v. Boucher

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 9, 2013
2012-1612 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2013)

Opinion

2012-1612 Interference No. 105,775

04-09-2013

GLENN W. CONNERY, GARY JASZEWSKI, AND RICHARD REID, Appellants, v. LAURENCE B. BOUCHER, STEPHEN E. BLIGHTMAN, PETER K. CRAFT, DAVID A. HIGGEN, CLIVE M. PHILBRICK, AND DARYL D. STARR, Appellees.

HECTOR J. RIBERA, Fenwick & West LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were LYNN H. PASAHOW and CAROLYN CHANG. THOMAS W. LATHRAM, Silicon Edge Law Group, LLP, of Pleasanton, California, argued for appellees. With him on the brief was MARK A. LAUER. Of counsel was CHARLES L. GHOLZ, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, of Alexandria, Virginia.


Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

HECTOR J. RIBERA, Fenwick & West LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were LYNN H. PASAHOW and CAROLYN CHANG.

THOMAS W. LATHRAM, Silicon Edge Law Group, LLP, of Pleasanton, California, argued for appellees. With him on the brief was MARK A. LAUER. Of counsel was CHARLES L. GHOLZ, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, of Alexandria, Virginia. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_____________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Connery v. Boucher

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 9, 2013
2012-1612 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Connery v. Boucher

Case Details

Full title:GLENN W. CONNERY, GARY JASZEWSKI, AND RICHARD REID, Appellants, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 9, 2013

Citations

2012-1612 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2013)