From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conners v. Filson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 10, 2023
3:15-cv-00372-RCJ-CLB (D. Nev. Oct. 10, 2023)

Opinion

3:15-cv-00372-RCJ-CLB

10-10-2023

DARRELL CONNERS, Petitioner, v. TIMOTHY FILSON, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Respondents and Petitioner Darrell Conners have filed a stipulation for an enlargement of time for Respondents to file their answer to Conners' first amended petition, explaining that “[t]he Clark County District Attorney's Office and Conners' counsel are engaged in continued discussions about Conners' conviction and sentence . . . which is . . . the subject of Conners' First Amended Petition.” (ECF No. 85.) The Court finds good cause to grant the stipulation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' stipulation (ECF No. 85) is GRANTED. Respondents will have up to and including February 6,2024, to file their answer.


Summaries of

Conners v. Filson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 10, 2023
3:15-cv-00372-RCJ-CLB (D. Nev. Oct. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Conners v. Filson

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL CONNERS, Petitioner, v. TIMOTHY FILSON, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 10, 2023

Citations

3:15-cv-00372-RCJ-CLB (D. Nev. Oct. 10, 2023)