From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conners v. Baca

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 24, 2015
CV 14-03451-R (AS) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2015)

Opinion

          Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Not present.

          Attorneys for Defendants: Not present.


          Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Re. Lack of Prosecution

          Alka Sagar, United States Magistrate Judge.

         On March 6, 2015, this Court dismissed Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (" SAC") with leave to amend. (Docket Entry No. 56.) Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (" TAC") was due no later than April 6, 2015. As of the date of this order, no TAC has been filed.

         Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than Friday, May 8, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. This Order will be discharged upon the filing of a TAC that cures the deficiencies in the last pleading, or by filing a declaration under penalty of perjury stating why Plaintiff is unable to do so.

         If Plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this action, he may request a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). A notice of dismissal form is attached for Plaintiff's convenience. Plaintiff is warned that a failure to timely respond to this Order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and obey court orders.


Summaries of

Conners v. Baca

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 24, 2015
CV 14-03451-R (AS) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Conners v. Baca

Case Details

Full title:Enoch Conners v. Leroy A Baca, et al

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 24, 2015

Citations

CV 14-03451-R (AS) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2015)