From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conners v. Baca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 13, 2015
No. CV 14-3451-R (AS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2015)

Opinion

No. CV 14-3451-R (AS)

11-13-2015

ENOCH CONNERS, Plaintiff, v. LEROY BACA, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed (see Docket Entry Nos. 48, 50), and concurs with the Magistrate Judge's orders construing Plaintiff's objections as requests for additional time to file a Third Amended Complaint (see Docket Entry Nos. 49, 51, 54). However, even after being granted several extensions of time to file a Third Amended Complaint curing the deficiencies of the Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff has failed to file a Third Amended Complaint. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff at his current address of record.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: November 13, 2015

/s/_________

MANUEL L. REAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Conners v. Baca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 13, 2015
No. CV 14-3451-R (AS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Conners v. Baca

Case Details

Full title:ENOCH CONNERS, Plaintiff, v. LEROY BACA, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 13, 2015

Citations

No. CV 14-3451-R (AS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2015)