From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conner v. Tilton

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jul 24, 2008
C-07-4965 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2008)

Opinion

C-07-4965 MMC (PR).

July 24, 2008


[PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX-PARTE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME


Counsel for Defendants N. Grannis, J. Tilton, J. Smith, R. Horel, M. Cook, and M. Foss filed a request for an extension of time of ninety (90) days, up to and including October 27, 2008, in which to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion.

The Court has read and considered Defendants' request and the accompanying declaration of counsel, and finds that good cause exists to grant the request. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' request for an extension of time is GRANTED, and that the time to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion is extended for ninety (90) days, up to and including October 27, 2008. Plaintiff's Opposition must be filed no later than thirty days after Defendants' motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen days after Plaintiff's opposition is filed.


Summaries of

Conner v. Tilton

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jul 24, 2008
C-07-4965 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Conner v. Tilton

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT ERIC CONNER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES TILTON, ET AL., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Jul 24, 2008

Citations

C-07-4965 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2008)