From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conner v. Flaska

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jan 7, 1927
252 P. 1001 (N.M. 1927)

Opinion

No. 3026.

January 7, 1927

Appeal from District Court, Bernalillo county; Ryan, Judge.

T.J. Mabry, of Albuquerque, for appellant.

George C. Taylor, of Albuquerque, for appellees.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Appellant, plaintiff below, sued to recover $75, a balance for professional services

38 Cyc p. 1470 n. 24. rendered. The jury found against him, and judgment followed. He complains here that, over his objection and exception, the court refused to allow his counsel to address the jury. This seems to have been the denial of a right which a party litigant enjoys under Code 1915, § 4467, which reads:

"Every plaintiff or defendant shall be entitled to be heard before the jury by an attorney, and if there be but one plaintiff or defendant, by two, and when there are several defendants having the same or separate defenses and appearing by the same or different attorneys, the court shall, before argument, arrange their order."

See Territory v. Sherron, 11 N.M. 515, 70 P. 562.

Because of this error, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial; and it is so ordered.

PARKER, C.J., and BICKLEY and WATSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Conner v. Flaska

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jan 7, 1927
252 P. 1001 (N.M. 1927)
Case details for

Conner v. Flaska

Case Details

Full title:CONNER v. FLASKA et ux

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: Jan 7, 1927

Citations

252 P. 1001 (N.M. 1927)
252 P. 1001

Citing Cases

Clark Advertising Agency, Inc. v. Tice

Delancey v. Motichek Towing Service, Inc., 5 Cir. 1970, 427 F.2d 897. Since there are no exceptional…