From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conner v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Aug 28, 2008
No. CIV-07-1097-C (W.D. Okla. Aug. 28, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV-07-1097-C.

August 28, 2008


ORDER


This action for judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance benefits was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Argo entered his Report and Recommendation on July 9, 2008, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Plaintiff, through counsel, has timely filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

In a thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, Judge Argo sets out the relevant facts and prevailing law, and no purpose would be served to repeat those here. In objection, Plaintiff merely restates the conclusions and legal argument originally asserted, and raises no issue not fully and accurately addressed and rejected by the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, the Court adopts and affirms, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons stated therein, the decision of the Commissioner in this case is affirmed. A judgment will enter accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Conner v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Aug 28, 2008
No. CIV-07-1097-C (W.D. Okla. Aug. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Conner v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ANNABELLE CONNER, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 28, 2008

Citations

No. CIV-07-1097-C (W.D. Okla. Aug. 28, 2008)