From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connell v. Brink

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1993
199 A.D.2d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 29, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly settled the record to include a map that purported to depict the north campus side of the University of Buffalo because that map was considered by the court in determining defendant's motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 5526). That map, however, which was concededly prepared after the accident, did not constitute the tender of "evidentiary proof in admissible form" (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562; cf., Collins v Tashjian, 124 A.D.2d 629, 630), and thus, should not have been considered by Supreme Court in determining defendant's motion.


Summaries of

Connell v. Brink

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1993
199 A.D.2d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Connell v. Brink

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN CONNELL, Appellant, v. GILBERT O. BRINK, Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
606 N.Y.S.2d 493