From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connal v. Rhoades

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1971
36 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Opinion

February 22, 1971


In an action to enjoin defendants from operating a sand and gravel bank and from removing earth and other materials, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, entered December 22, 1969 after a nonjury trial, which dismissed the complaint. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and case remitted to the trial court for adjudication of the action on the merits, with costs to abide the event. The ground upon which the trial court dismissed the complaint was that Ordinance No. 9 of the Town of Southeast, upon which plaintiffs relied, had not been published in accordance with section 133 Town of the Town Law. However, the requirements of that section were met in that Ordinance No. 9 was duly passed by the Town Board, was duly and timely published after passage in the newspaper circulating in the town and was duly posted, and the Town Clerk stapled a copy of the ordinance to the minute book of the town within a few weeks after passage of the ordinance ( Northern Operating Corp. v. Town of Ramapo, 26 N.Y.2d 404). Munder, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Connal v. Rhoades

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1971
36 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)
Case details for

Connal v. Rhoades

Case Details

Full title:PETER B. CONNAL et al., Constituting the Planning Board of the Town of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1971

Citations

36 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

North Shore Child Guidance v. Inc. Village

We find that this constituted sufficient compliance with the requirement that the ordinance be placed within…