From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conlin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Oct 20, 2020
609 S.W.3d 103 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108431

10-20-2020

Dennis M. CONLIN, Jr. Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Steven Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, MO 63101. FOR RESPONDENT: Robert Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.


FOR APPELLANT: Steven Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Robert Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Philip M. Hess, J., and Michael E. Gardner, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis M. Conlin, Jr. appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion under Rule 29.15, Mo. R. Civ. P. 2018 after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) 2020.


Summaries of

Conlin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Oct 20, 2020
609 S.W.3d 103 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Conlin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dennis M. CONLIN, Jr. Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Oct 20, 2020

Citations

609 S.W.3d 103 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)