Opinion
Argued January 29, 1902
Decided February 18, 1902
Benjamin Patterson for appellant.
Henry B. Twombly for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Conklin v. Woodbury Dermatological Institute
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 18, 1902
62 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1902)
Summaries of
Conklin v. Woodbury Dermatological Institute
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 18, 1902
62 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1902)
Case details for
Conklin v. Woodbury Dermatological Institute
Case Details
Full title:JAMES D. CONKLIN, Respondent, v . JOHN H. WOODBURY DERMATOLOGICAL…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 18, 1902
Citations
62 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1902)
170 N.Y. 571