From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conklin v. Woodbury Dermatological Institute

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 18, 1902
62 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1902)

Opinion

Argued January 29, 1902

Decided February 18, 1902

Benjamin Patterson for appellant.

Henry B. Twombly for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ.


Summaries of

Conklin v. Woodbury Dermatological Institute

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 18, 1902
62 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1902)
Case details for

Conklin v. Woodbury Dermatological Institute

Case Details

Full title:JAMES D. CONKLIN, Respondent, v . JOHN H. WOODBURY DERMATOLOGICAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 18, 1902

Citations

62 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1902)
170 N.Y. 571