From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conklin v. Warrington Township

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 25, 2007
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-02245 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 25, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-02245.

July 25, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2007, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions to dismiss Plaintiff's original complaint (Doc. Nos. 4, 6, 8, 13) are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint filed by Defendants David Doe, Susan Doe, Pamela Lee, Gregory Gettle (Doc. No. 35) and by Edwin A.D. Shwartz (Doc. No 37) are DENIED as moot, as these motions and supporting materials have been refiled by these Defendants in accordance with the Clerk of Court's February 9, 2007, instructions.


Summaries of

Conklin v. Warrington Township

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 25, 2007
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-02245 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 25, 2007)
Case details for

Conklin v. Warrington Township

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN G. CONKLIN, Plaintiff v. WARRINGTON TOWNSHIP, REBECCA KNAUB…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 25, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-02245 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 25, 2007)