From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conklin v. Warrington Township

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 10, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-2245 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-2245.

December 10, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2009, upon consideration of the notice (Doc. 119), filed by plaintiff on December 1, 2009, wherein plaintiff requests that the court "Please `End, discontinue, and terminate' as to Warrington Township and Rebecca Knaub," (id.), and it appearing that Warrington Township and Rebecca Knaub are the only defendants remaining in the above-captioned matter, and recognizing that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), "an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff's request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper," it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's notice to "End, discontinue, and terminate as to Warrington Township and Rebecca Knaub" is CONSTRUED as a Rule 41(a) request for voluntary dismissal and is GRANTED as so construed. All claims against defendants Warrington Township and Rebecca Knaub are DISMISSED with prejudice.
2. Defendants' motion (Doc. 114) for summary judgment is DENIED as moot.
3. The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Conklin v. Warrington Township

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 10, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-2245 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Conklin v. Warrington Township

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN G. CONKLIN, Plaintiff v. WARRINGTON TOWNSHIP and REBECCA KNAUB…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 10, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-2245 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2009)