Opinion
Argued April 27, 1891
Decided June 2, 1891
A.H. Gleason for appellant.
Charles Haines for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except VANN, J., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Conklin v. Tice
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1891
127 N.Y. 670 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Conklin v. Tice
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1891
127 N.Y. 670 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Conklin v. Tice
Case Details
Full title:BRIDGET CONKLIN, Respondent, v . WILLIAM H. TICE, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 2, 1891
Citations
127 N.Y. 670 (N.Y. 1891)
38 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1016