From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conklin v. Snider

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1887
9 N.E. 880 (N.Y. 1887)

Summary

In Conklin v. Snider (104 N.Y. 641) it was said: "The order of the General Term having been a proper one we cannot reverse, but must affirm it, and the plaintiffs' stipulation on the appeal to this court, compels an award of judgment absolute against them.

Summary of this case from Freel v. County of Queens

Opinion

Argued November 22, 1886

Decided January 18, 1887

William J. Hardy for appellant.

Irving Brown for respondent.



FINCH, J., reads for affirmance of order of General Term and for judgment absolute against plaintiff on stipulation.

All concur.

Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Conklin v. Snider

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1887
9 N.E. 880 (N.Y. 1887)

In Conklin v. Snider (104 N.Y. 641) it was said: "The order of the General Term having been a proper one we cannot reverse, but must affirm it, and the plaintiffs' stipulation on the appeal to this court, compels an award of judgment absolute against them.

Summary of this case from Freel v. County of Queens
Case details for

Conklin v. Snider

Case Details

Full title:JACOB H. CONKLIN et al., as Trustees, etc., Appellants, v . GARRET Z…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 18, 1887

Citations

9 N.E. 880 (N.Y. 1887)
9 N.E. 880
5 N.Y. St. Rptr. 556

Citing Cases

Wright v. City of Mount Vernon

On the contrary, on the appeal to the Court of Appeals, it stipulated for judgment absolute, provided the…

Freel v. County of Queens

" In Conklin v. Snider ( 104 N.Y. 641) it was said: "The order of the General Term having been a proper one…