From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conklin v. Doe

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Oct 22, 2024
3:24-CV-0189 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 22, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-CV-0189

10-22-2024

DONALD R. CONKLIN IV, Plaintiff v. JOHN DOE, et al., Defendants


ORDER

JUDGE JULIA K. MUNLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

AND NOW, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

BY THE COURT:


Summaries of

Conklin v. Doe

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Oct 22, 2024
3:24-CV-0189 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Conklin v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:DONALD R. CONKLIN IV, Plaintiff v. JOHN DOE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 22, 2024

Citations

3:24-CV-0189 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 22, 2024)