Opinion
Argued October 3, 1922
Decided October 19, 1922
Harvey D. Hinman for appellants.
F.J. Mangan for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Conklin v. Conklin
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1922
138 N.E. 441 (N.Y. 1922)
Summaries of
Conklin v. Conklin
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1922
138 N.E. 441 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for
Conklin v. Conklin
Case Details
Full title:ANNA M. CONKLIN, Plaintiff, v . HORACE E. CONKLIN, Respondent. In the…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 19, 1922
Citations
138 N.E. 441 (N.Y. 1922)
138 N.E. 441
Citing Cases
Seitz v. Seitz
( Conklin v. Conklin, 201 App. Div. 170, affd. 234 N.Y. 546; Keane v. Keane, 86 Hun 159 [1st Dept.]; Pettet…
Rosen v. RosenAn award for counsel fees contemplates prospective services and disbursements and may not be made as an…