From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conklin v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 1, 2022
No. 5910-22 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

5910-22

11-01-2022

STACEY CONKLIN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

It has come to the Court's attention that the Petition filed in this case on March 2, 2022, was not properly executed in that it does not bear the original signatures of petitioner nor of a practitioner admitted to practice before this Court. The foregoing considered, it is

ORDERED that on or before December 12, 2022, petitioner Stacey Conklin shall electronically file a proper ratification bearing her signature in which petitioner Stacey Conklinstate, if such be the case, that petitioner has read the petition filed on March 2, 2022, and ratify and affirm the filing of said document. Petitioner should note that an actual signature on a PDF or a signature using an authentication program (e.g., Adobe or DocuSign) are acceptable. For more information about signatures, please refer to Tax Court Rule 23(a)(3) and the DAWSON FAQs available on the Tax Court website. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this case for lack of jurisdiction. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to this Order a form that petitioner Stacey Conklin may use to comply with this Order.


Summaries of

Conklin v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 1, 2022
No. 5910-22 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Conklin v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:STACEY CONKLIN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

No. 5910-22 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 1, 2022)