From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conklin v. City of Reno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 4, 2011
CASE NO.: 3:08-cv-00452-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 4, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:08-cv-00452-LRH-RAM

08-04-2011

LAURA CONKLIN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF RENO, a municipal corporation, PETER RINALDO, an individual, ROBERT MCDONALD, an individual, Defendants.

JOHN J. KADLIC Reno City- Attorney DONALD L. CHRISTEN SEN Deputy. City Attorney Attorney for Defendants Jeffrey A. Dickerson Esq. Law Office of Jeffrey Dickerson Attorney for Plaintiff DONALD L. CHRISTENSEN Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants


JOHN J. KADLIC

Reno City- Attorney

DONALD L. CHRISTEN SEN

Deputy. City Attorney

Attorney for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate that this matter may be dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees.

Jeffrey A. Dickerson Esq.

Law Office of Jeffrey Dickerson

Attorney for Plaintiff

DONALD L. CHRISTENSEN

Deputy City Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED

___________________

UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Conklin v. City of Reno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 4, 2011
CASE NO.: 3:08-cv-00452-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Conklin v. City of Reno

Case Details

Full title:LAURA CONKLIN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF RENO, a municipal corporation, PETER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:08-cv-00452-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 4, 2011)