Conklin v. Anthou

Full title: STEPHEN G. CONKLIN, Plaintiff v. KRISTINE M. ANTHOU, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 6, 2011

CIVIL NO. 1:CV-10-2501 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 6, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:CV-10-2501.

July 6, 2011

ORDER

SYLVIA RAMBO, District Judge

Before the court is a June 16, 2011, report of the magistrate judge to whom this matter is referred. The magistrate judge recommends that Plaintiff's motion for stay pending appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (doc. 57) be denied. The magistrate judge further recommends that Plaintiff's request for a 10-day extension of time to respond to all pending motions to dismiss contained in the motion to stay be granted.¹ No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed.²

1 The court notes that Plaintiff has filed his responses to the motions to dismiss and a later request for an extension of time (doc. 60) was mooted by order of the magistrate judge on June 29, 2011 (doc. 65).

2 Objections were due no later than July 5, 2011.

Upon consideration of the record before the court and the applicable law, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1) The court adopts in part the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Blewitt.

2) The recommendation that Plaintiff's motion to stay (doc. 57) be denied is adopted and Plaintiff's motion to stay is denied.

3) The recommendation that Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file responses to the motions to dismiss be granted is not adopted. Plaintiff has filed responses to the pending motions to dismiss and therefore the request is moot.

4) This matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Blewitt.