From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conkleton v. Muro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 21, 2011
Civil Action No.: 08-cv-02612-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 21, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 08-cv-02612-WYD-MEH

10-21-2011

JAMES K. CONKLETON, Plaintiff, v. ED MURO and RICHARD DeGROOT, Defendants.


CHIEF JUDGE

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY

OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS

It is ORDERED that upon the conclusion of the trial, counsel for the parties shall retain custody of their respective exhibits and depositions until such time as all need for the exhibits and depositions has terminated and the time to appeal has expired, or all appellate proceedings have been terminated, plus sixty days.

BY THE COURT:

WILEY Y. DANIEL,

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Conkleton v. Muro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 21, 2011
Civil Action No.: 08-cv-02612-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Conkleton v. Muro

Case Details

Full title:JAMES K. CONKLETON, Plaintiff, v. ED MURO and RICHARD DeGROOT, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 21, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No.: 08-cv-02612-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 21, 2011)