From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CONKLETON v. MURO

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 13, 2011
Civil Action No. 08-cv-02612-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02612-WYD-MEH.

October 13, 2011


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court in connection with Plaintiff's letter to the Court dated October 5, 2011, and filed October 11, 2011. In the letter, Plaintiff asks whether subpoenas have been issued for Anthony Piper and Paul Hollenbeck. Both of these individuals are designated as a witness on Plaintiff's Witness List.

To answer the Plaintiff's inquiry, subpoenas have not been served on Mr. Piper or Mr. Hollenbeck. This issue was discussed at the Final Trial Preparation Conference on September 29, 2011. At that time, Plaintiff was informed that the Court did not have subpoenas for these witnesses and directed Plaintiff to submit subpoenas with these witnesses' addresses. The Court has not received such subpoenas from Plaintiff. Accordingly, if Plaintiff wants subpoenas to be issued for Mr. Piper and/or Mr. Hollenbeck, he must comply with the Court's directive to submit subpoenas for them.


Summaries of

CONKLETON v. MURO

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 13, 2011
Civil Action No. 08-cv-02612-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

CONKLETON v. MURO

Case Details

Full title:JAMES K. CONKLETON, Plaintiff, v. ED MURO, in his individual capacity as a…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02612-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 13, 2011)