From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conkle v. Bellevue

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 21, 1927
159 N.E. 581 (Ohio 1927)

Opinion

No. 19725

Decided December 21, 1927.

Municipal corporations — Assessments — Injunction concurrent remedy — Section 12075, General Code.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Sandusky county.

Mr. Allen G. Aigler, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Kenneth P. Fox, for defendant in error.


It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Sandusky county be and the same hereby is reversed. In the opinion of a majority of this court, Section 12075 of the General Code provides a concurrent remedy under the facts and circumstances of this controversy. It is therefore ordered that said cause be remanded to the Court of Appeals of Sandusky county for further proceedings according to law.

Judgment reversed.

MARSHALL, C.J., ALLEN, KINKADE, and ROBINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Conkle v. Bellevue

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 21, 1927
159 N.E. 581 (Ohio 1927)
Case details for

Conkle v. Bellevue

Case Details

Full title:CONKLE v. CITY OF BELLEVUE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 21, 1927

Citations

159 N.E. 581 (Ohio 1927)
159 N.E. 581

Citing Cases

Lewellyn v. Village of South Zanesville

Such action would protect the property owner and the public treasury. We have been placed in possession of a…