Opinion
CIVIL 22-185
08-10-2022
MICHAEL CONIKER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW HREZO, et al. Defendants.
Michael Coniker, pro se Care Of: Meraky / Forensics Jason Michael Coniker, pro se 556 Union Avenue Ext Pittsburgh, PA 15229
Michael Coniker, pro se Care Of: Meraky / Forensics Jason
Michael Coniker, pro se 556 Union Avenue Ext Pittsburgh, PA 15229
ORDER
MARILYN J. HORAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
On March 21, 2022, the Court determined that Plaintiff Michael Coniker's Complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. ECF No. 3. The Court provided Mr. Coniker the opportunity to file an amended complaint by April 20, 2022, or else the Court would dismiss the complaint. Id. Mr. Coniker did not file an amended complaint, or any other pleading, by April 20, 2022. Therefore, on May 17, 2022, the Court dismissed the Complaint and closed this case. ECF No. 5.
Mr. Coniker has now filed a “Motion to Reopen Case and Appoint Patrick Thomassey as 2nd Chair.” ECF No. 7. Mr. Coniker has also filed three requests for Court action, as follows: An emergency request for a “wellness” evaluation of third parties (ECF No. 6); a request to “Protect Philips Voicetracer audio recording device” (ECF No. 8); and a request for the immediate release of certain FBI information (ECF No. 9). Finally, Mr. Coniker has filed approximately 100 pages of exhibits. ECF No. 10.
The Court has thoroughly reviewed all of the above filings and concludes that Mr. Coniker has not provided good cause to justify reopening this case. Notably, Mr. Coniker does not explain why he failed to file an amended complaint by the April 20, 2022 deadline. Even now, he does not provide a proposed amended complaint to attempt to rectify his initial Complaint's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Accordingly, the following order is hereby entered.
AND NOW, this 10th day of August 2022, Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case and Appoint Patrick Thomassey as 2nd Chair” (ECF No. 7) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other outstanding motions, ECF Nos. 6, 8, & 9, are DENIED, as this case is closed.